Products

What we are building.

Auditable clinical software developed by VGSI and designed for evaluation with healthcare organisations.

Product portfolio

A portfolio built around clinical accountability.

Each product addresses a different workflow, but follows the same rule: AI supports; the professional reviews and decides.

Anonymised SICC interface for clinical coding support with human review

01 · Lead product

SICC

Working MVP · Preparing for institutional evaluation

SICC supports clinical coding with contextual suggestions linked to source evidence, mandatory professional review and a traceable record of decisions.

  • Evidence-linked
  • Human review and approval
  • Auditable workflow
Learn more
Morpheus product illustration showing sleep signals, a hypnogram and supervised review

02 · Research and development · Investigational

Morpheus

Morpheus explores clinician-supervised review of multimodal sleep-study signals and information, keeping qualified professionals in control.

  • Research and development · Investigational
Learn more

Progression is subject to technical validation, clinical evidence, data rights, regulatory assessment and commercial readiness.

Lead product

From documentation to accountable decision support.

SICC helps clinical coding teams read documentation, propose codes in context, and justify each suggestion with the clinical evidence behind it. The final decision always rests with the professional.

Working MVP · Preparing for institutional evaluation

01

Processes clinical documentation

Reads long, heterogeneous clinical records and organises the relevant detail.

02

Contextual coding suggestions

Proposes codes with the episode, history and clinical context in view.

03

Evidence-linked

Every suggestion points back to the clinical passages supporting it.

04

Human review and approval

Nothing is submitted without validation by the responsible professional.

05

Auditable workflow

A full record of suggestions, changes and approvals for internal audit.

A human-in-the-loop model, not autonomous coding.

SICC · Evidence linked
Anonymised view of the SICC workflow for document review and coding suggestions

The problem

Fragmented documentation, decisions that are hard to justify.

Clinical teams work with information scattered across systems and formats. Manual review is slow, and the reasoning behind each decision is not always recorded.

Scattered information

Clinical notes, reports and structured data live in different systems, in different formats.

Manual, specialist effort

Reviewing long documentation consumes specialist time that is needed elsewhere.

Hard to reconstruct the trail

Without an explicit link to evidence, justifying a decision at audit becomes slow work.

Talk to us

Let’s evaluate where accountable clinical AI can add value.

We welcome conversations with healthcare institutions, clinical coding teams, researchers, technology collaborators and investors.

Evaluate SICC

For healthcare organisations interested in a controlled evaluation of SICC.

Send a message

Technology and research collaboration

For research, clinical or technology teams.

Send a message